Kejriwal Seeks Judge’s Recusal In Delhi HC
Aam Aadmi Party chief Arvind Kejriwal appeared in person before the Delhi High Court and sought the recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma from hearing the liquor policy case linked to him. The development has drawn attention because Kejriwal argued the issue was not the judge’s integrity, but his apprehension that he may not get a fair hearing in the matter.
Arvind Kejriwal Recusal Plea In Delhi High Court
Kejriwal personally addressed the court and set out multiple reasons for seeking Justice Sharma’s recusal. According to reports, he raised objections to earlier observations and orders in the case, saying they created a reasonable apprehension of bias. He also pointed to the pace and conduct of proceedings as part of the grounds for his request.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma Hearing
Justice Sharma heard submissions from Kejriwal as well as objections from the other side. Reports said the judge noted that such a request had not been made before her in this manner earlier. After hearing arguments, the court reserved its order on whether she would continue with the matter or step aside from the case.
Delhi Liquor Policy Case Court Development
The recusal plea relates to proceedings in the Delhi excise policy case, which has remained one of the most politically charged legal matters involving AAP leaders. The hearing became more significant because Kejriwal chose to argue in person, turning the courtroom exchange into a major legal and political moment.
Why The Kejriwal Recusal Plea Matters
The plea matters because it raises larger questions about judicial perception, courtroom strategy and the legal handling of high-profile political cases. The court’s eventual order on recusal will now be closely watched, as it could shape the direction and tone of further hearings in the excise policy matter.
