Image Credit: X account @CMOMaharashtra
Maharashtra CM Advocates Legal Removal of Aurangzeb’s Tomb
Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has expressed support for the removal of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb’s tomb in Khuldabad, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar district. However, he emphasized that any action must follow legal protocols, as the site is under the protection of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).
Legal Constraints Due to ASI Protection
Fadnavis pointed out that the tomb was designated as a protected site during a previous Congress administration, placing it under ASI’s jurisdiction. He stressed that any decision regarding its removal must be within the legal framework governing protected historical sites.
Calls for Removal by Shivaji Descendant
The call for the tomb’s removal was initiated by Udayanraje Bhosale, a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Member of Parliament and a direct descendant of Maratha king Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. He has been advocating for the tomb’s removal, arguing that such a monument should not exist in Maharashtra.
Controversy Sparked by Praise for Aurangzeb
The controversy gained momentum following remarks by Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Asim Azmi, who praised Aurangzeb and claimed that he had built temples and was not a cruel ruler. His comments led to his suspension from the Maharashtra legislative assembly until the end of the budget session on March 26.
Historical Significance of Aurangzeb’s Tomb
Aurangzeb’s tomb, located in Khuldabad, is known for its simplicity compared to other grand Mughal mausoleums. It is a modest, open grave covered with a plain white cloth, as per the emperor’s wishes. The site also houses the dargah of Sheikh Zainuddin, a revered Sufi saint, adding to its historical and cultural significance.
Political Reactions and Legal Considerations
The BJP has consistently opposed the glorification of Aurangzeb and has supported the demand for his tomb’s removal. However, Fadnavis reiterated that while there is agreement on the issue, any action must be in accordance with legal procedures due to its protected status under ASI regulations.
Conclusion
The debate over Aurangzeb’s tomb reflects the complexities of addressing historical legacies in contemporary politics. As discussions continue, adherence to legal procedures remains crucial to ensure that any action taken is lawful and aligns with India’s heritage conservation policies.
