U.S. Gaza Force Plan Faces Pushback At UN
The United States’ proposal for a UN-mandated international stabilisation force in Gaza has met resistance from several key members of the Security Council. The draft resolution seeks both a multinational force to operate through 2027 and a transitional civilian authority called the “Board of Peace” to guide governance during the stabilisation phase. Russia and China objected to the structure of the proposed governing body and questioned its legal foundation, while Arab states said the plan lacks sufficient clarity on Palestinian self-rule.
Calls For Clarity On Governance And Security
Diplomats said Russia and China want the “Board of Peace” removed entirely, arguing that it overrides the Palestinian Authority. Arab states, including the UAE, have asked for clearer definitions of who would serve on the board and how security control would transition. The proposal also includes provisions for demilitarisation, border security cooperation and training of a new local force, all of which remain points of contention.
Uncertain Path Ahead For Resolution
For passage, the draft needs at least nine affirmative votes and no veto by a permanent member. With strong dissent from Russia and China, the text is expected to undergo revisions. U.S. officials indicated that if the resolution fails, Washington may consider forming a coalition outside the UN framework. The diplomatic struggle reflects deep divisions over Gaza’s future governance and who should hold authority during the post-conflict period.
