Image Credit: X account @DrSJaishankar
Twelve States Sue Trump Over Sweeping Tariffs
In a major legal challenge, twelve U.S. states have jointly filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump, opposing the sweeping tariffs introduced under his “Liberation Day” initiative. The plaintiffs argue that the tariffs are unconstitutional and have caused serious economic damage across multiple sectors.
The lawsuit, lodged in the U.S. Court of International Trade, contends that the President acted beyond his constitutional authority by imposing tariffs without Congressional authorization. The coalition includes states such as Arizona, New York, Minnesota, Illinois, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Nevada, New Mexico, Vermont, and Oregon.
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes described the move as “economically reckless” and “legally indefensible,” underscoring growing discontent among state leaders regarding the impact of the tariffs on domestic industries and consumers.
Liberation Day Tariffs
The tariffs in question were unveiled as part of President Trump’s “Liberation Day” policy, which places a blanket 10% tariff on all imported goods. Additionally, certain categories of imports, particularly from countries like China, face even steeper tariffs—reportedly exceeding 145%.
The administration has invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify these tariffs, claiming they are necessary to address national emergencies including trade imbalances and illegal immigration.
However, critics maintain that the use of IEEPA in this context stretches the intent of the legislation and grants the executive branch unchecked powers that rightfully belong to Congress.
IEEPA Challenge and Legal Implications
At the heart of the legal dispute is the interpretation of IEEPA. The plaintiffs argue that the law does not authorize the President to make sweeping changes to trade policy in the absence of a genuine emergency or Congressional mandate. They claim the tariffs are disrupting business operations, raising consumer prices, and causing long-term harm to the U.S. economy.
Adding to the legal pressure, several small business groups have filed independent lawsuits echoing similar concerns. They argue that the sudden rise in import costs has rendered many of their operations financially unsustainable, forcing layoffs and closures.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the case is poised to test the limits of executive authority over trade policy. A ruling in favor of the plaintiffs could rein in the President’s ability to invoke emergency powers in economic matters, while a ruling for the administration would further entrench the executive branch’s control over trade—a domain traditionally reserved for Congress.
The outcome of this legal battle will likely shape not just the future of U.S. tariff policy, but also the broader dynamics of power between the legislative and executive branches in trade governance.
