Supreme Court Stays Aravalli Verdict, Seeks Clarification
The Supreme Court has stayed the operation of its recent verdict related to the Aravalli range, observing that certain aspects of the judgment require further clarification before it can be implemented. The court said ambiguity in the earlier directions could lead to unintended consequences and therefore needs reconsideration.
The order was passed by a bench headed by Justice Surya Kant, which kept its previous ruling in abeyance while agreeing to examine concerns raised by multiple stakeholders. The court noted that the interpretation adopted earlier regarding the identification and classification of the Aravalli range needed closer scrutiny.
Concerns Over Definition and Impact
The earlier judgment had attempted to define the Aravalli range based on specific geographical and physical parameters. This definition drew criticism from environmental groups, who argued that it could exclude large tracts traditionally considered part of the Aravallis from legal protection. Petitioners contended that such an interpretation might open up ecologically sensitive areas to mining and construction activities.
Taking note of these concerns, the Supreme Court observed that environmental protection, regulatory clarity, and scientific accuracy must be balanced carefully. The bench said that any definition adopted by the court should not result in dilution of safeguards due to technical or interpretational gaps.
Expert Review and Next Steps
The court indicated that a fresh examination by subject experts may be required to address the complexities involved. Notices have been issued to the central government and states through which the Aravalli range passes, seeking their responses. The matter is expected to be heard again after these inputs are placed on record.
Until further orders, the earlier verdict will remain stayed. The court made it clear that the pause is temporary and intended to ensure that its final decision is precise, enforceable, and environmentally sound.
