Supreme Court Revives Andhra Graft Cases
The Supreme Court has set aside an earlier order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court that had quashed multiple corruption cases, thereby reviving stalled investigations. The apex court held that serious allegations of corruption should not be terminated at a preliminary stage on procedural grounds without examining the merits of the cases.
High Court Order Overturned
The Andhra Pradesh High Court had earlier quashed several first information reports registered by the state Anti-Corruption Bureau, citing the absence of updated jurisdictional notifications following the bifurcation of the state. The Supreme Court disagreed with this view, observing that such technical objections could not invalidate investigations that were otherwise lawfully initiated.
Clear Directions on Investigation
The Supreme Court restored the quashed cases and directed the Anti-Corruption Bureau to proceed with investigations and complete them within a stipulated timeframe. At the same time, the court restrained authorities from taking coercive steps, including arrests, during this investigation period. The court clarified that the accused would have the right to challenge any charge sheets filed later, in accordance with the law.
Focus on Substantive Justice
The bench emphasised that courts must prioritise substantive justice over hyper-technical interpretations, particularly in corruption cases involving public servants. It noted that procedural lapses, if any, should not become a shield to avoid scrutiny of serious allegations.
Impact on Future Cases
Legal experts say the ruling reinforces the principle that technical defects should not derail anti-corruption proceedings. The judgment is expected to serve as guidance for lower courts dealing with jurisdiction-related challenges in corruption cases.
