Supreme Court Reserves Verdict On Harish Rana Plea
The Supreme Court has reserved its judgment on a petition seeking permission to withdraw life-sustaining treatment for Harish Rana, who has remained in a permanent vegetative state for over a decade. The bench said the case involves complex legal, ethical and medical considerations and requires careful examination.
Case Background
Harish Rana suffered a severe head injury in 2013 after a fall from a building and has since been dependent on life-sustaining medical care. Medical reports placed before the court state that his condition is irreversible, with no realistic possibility of recovery. His family has approached the court seeking approval to discontinue artificial nutrition and hydration.
Arguments Before The Court
The petitioner argued that continuing life support violates the patient’s right to live with dignity and relied on earlier Supreme Court rulings that allow passive euthanasia under strict safeguards. Submissions were also made on the need for clear procedures, medical board approvals and consent norms.
What Lies Ahead
The court said it would pronounce its decision after considering all legal and constitutional aspects. The verdict is expected to clarify how existing guidelines on withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment should be applied in similar cases.
