Supreme Court criticises Jan Suraaj Party petition
Supreme Court Rebukes Jan Suraaj Party
The Supreme Court sharply criticised a petition filed by Prashant Kishor’s Jan Suraaj Party, questioning the intent behind the plea and warning against using the judiciary for publicity. The observations came during a hearing where the court examined the party’s challenge related to electoral matters.
Supreme Court Criticism Of Jan Suraaj Party Petition
The bench expressed displeasure over the nature of the petition, stating courts should not be approached for political messaging. The judges remarked that if people reject a party in elections, the solution lies in public engagement rather than litigation.
The court indicated that legal forums cannot be used to gain attention or influence political narratives outside constitutional questions.
Remarks From Chief Justice During Hearing
During the proceedings, the Chief Justice made strong oral observations questioning the purpose of the filing. The bench suggested that democratic accountability is decided by voters and not through court intervention unless a clear legal violation exists.
The comments underscored judicial reluctance to entertain matters viewed as political strategy rather than constitutional grievance.
Court’s Stand On Political Litigation
The court reiterated that petitions must demonstrate a concrete legal issue and not seek general directions rooted in political disagreement. It emphasised the distinction between electoral outcomes and legal disputes.
Following the remarks, the matter did not proceed further in substantive hearing, reinforcing the court’s position on limiting politically motivated litigation.
