Shoaib Akhtar Criticises Mohsin Naqvi After T20 World Cup Exit
Former Pakistan fast bowler Shoaib Akhtar has publicly criticised Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chief Mohsin Naqvi following Pakistan’s exit from the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026. Akhtar’s remarks highlight growing discontent over the team’s performance and administrative decisions after the side failed to qualify for the semifinals.
Shoaib Akhtar Blasts PCB Leadership
Shoaib Akhtar described the Pakistan Cricket Board’s management as “clueless” and questioned strategic decisions that contributed to Pakistan’s early elimination from the T20 World Cup. Despite a narrow win over Sri Lanka, Pakistan’s net run rate was insufficient to advance to the semifinal stage, ending their campaign before the knockout rounds. Akhtar criticised selection choices and suggested that incorrect decisions over the course of the tournament undermined the team’s chances.
He singled out aspects of the organisation around Mohsin Naqvi, while conceding that Naqvi personally is a powerful figure, saying that if Pakistan continues to miss major tournament semifinals, then the system within the board needs urgent review.
Pakistan’s Tournament Performance Issues
Pakistan’s failure to reach the semifinals at the 2026 T20 World Cup continues a disappointing run in ICC events. The team has now missed the last four semifinal qualifications across multiple major tournaments, including previous World Cups and the Champions Trophy. Analysts have pointed to inconsistent tactics, faulty selection combinations and underperformance in critical matches as factors in the early exit.
The Super Eight phase saw Pakistan win key fixtures but not by margins large enough to boost their net run rate ahead of competitors such as New Zealand.
Debate Over PCB Strategy and Future Direction
Akhtar’s comments have added to broader debates about future leadership and strategy within Pakistan cricket. Calls for structural changes and stronger advisory teams have emerged from former players and commentators. Discussions on how to rebuild a competitive unit for upcoming international assignments are expected to continue as scrutiny of the board’s performance intensifies.
