Shashi Tharoor Admits Misjudgment on India’s Russia-Ukraine Stance
Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has acknowledged that his initial opposition to India’s neutral stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict was a misjudgment. Speaking at a recent event, Tharoor admitted that India’s balanced approach has strengthened its global diplomatic position, allowing it to engage with both Russia and Ukraine.
Tharoor’s Initial Criticism
In February 2022, Tharoor was among the few parliamentarians who openly criticized India’s position on the Russia-Ukraine war. He argued that India should have strongly condemned Russia’s actions, citing violations of the UN Charter and Ukraine’s sovereignty. His stance reflected concerns that neutrality could weaken India’s credibility on the global stage.
Reevaluation of India’s Neutral Approach
Three years later, Tharoor has revised his stance, conceding that India’s neutrality has brought diplomatic advantages. He pointed out that Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ability to engage with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky within weeks demonstrates India’s growing influence in global diplomacy. “A Prime Minister who can hug both Putin and Zelenskyy within weeks of each other is a PM who has positioned himself and the country in a useful place in world affairs,” Tharoor stated, recognizing the strategic benefits of India’s position.
India’s Potential Role in Peacekeeping
Tharoor also suggested that India could play a role in peacekeeping if a mutually agreed settlement between Russia and Ukraine is reached. He highlighted India’s strong track record in UN peacekeeping missions and suggested that non-European forces, including India, could help ensure stability. “There might be a role for a country like India in the event of an agreed peace,” he remarked, adding that Russia is unlikely to accept NATO peacekeepers in the region.
India’s Commitment to Global Stability
India has long been a significant contributor to global peacekeeping efforts, having participated in over 49 UN peacekeeping missions. Tharoor’s statements indicate a recognition that India’s approach to the Russia-Ukraine conflict has not only safeguarded its strategic interests but also enhanced its credibility as a potential mediator.
Shashi Tharoor’s candid admission underscores the complexities of international diplomacy. While initial skepticism surrounded India’s neutral stance, its ability to maintain ties with both Russia and Ukraine has reinforced its position as a key player in global peace efforts. As the situation evolves, India’s role could prove critical in facilitating diplomatic solutions.
