SC Softens Stray-Dog Order, Balances Safety and Welfare
Earlier in August 2025, the Supreme Court ordered all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR to be captured and shifted to shelters within eight weeks. The directive stated that the dogs must be sterilized and vaccinated, and none should be returned to the streets. The court also directed authorities to set up a helpline for dog bite cases. The order came after a sharp increase in bite incidents, rabies infections, and deaths across urban centers.
Criticism and Public Outcry
The decision drew heavy criticism from animal rights groups, welfare organizations, and public figures. They argued that the ruling conflicted with the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules of 2023, which allow sterilized and vaccinated dogs to be released back to their original areas. Critics described the judgment as “inhumane” and warned it could lead to overcrowded shelters and increased aggression among confined dogs. Protests were organized in several cities, with activists demanding a more balanced approach.
Revised Supreme Court Decision
On August 22, a new bench of the Supreme Court issued a revised order. It allowed sterilized and vaccinated stray dogs to be released back to their original locations, except for rabid or aggressive animals. The court emphasized that humane handling of strays must go hand in hand with protecting citizens from attacks. This change was seen as a middle ground between public safety concerns and animal welfare principles.
Implementation Challenges
The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) has stepped up drives to capture aggressive stray dogs, focusing on sensitive areas such as schools, hospitals, and public parks. However, challenges remain, as nearly 40% of veterinary and animal-catching positions are unfilled. Shelter facilities are being expanded, but limited space and resources continue to slow progress.
Rising Tensions and Protests
The ruling also triggered tense protests in the capital. Demonstrators gathered at sites such as Central Park, with clashes reported in some cases. In a separate incident, Delhi’s Chief Minister was confronted during a public hearing by an activist angered by the original relocation order. Though no harm was caused, the episode highlighted the emotional weight the issue carries for many citizens.=
