SC Says Pahalgam Cannot Be Ignored in J&K Statehood Case
The Supreme Court has directed the central government to respond to a petition seeking the restoration of Jammu and Kashmir’s statehood, stressing that recent ground realities — like events in Pahalgam — must not be overlooked.
Court Highlights Regional Concerns
During the hearing, the bench led by Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran drew attention to recent incidents in Pahalgam, underlining that such developments are relevant in assessing whether to restore statehood. The court emphasized that decisions must reflect the current security and political climate.
Centre Asked to Respond
The court has ordered the Centre to file its response within eight weeks. Petitioners, including academic and socio-political activists, had requested reinstatement of statehood within two months, citing erosion of democratic governance and federal principles.
Legal and Political Background
In December 2023, a Supreme Court bench upheld the abrogation of Article 370 but urged restoration of statehood “at the earliest.” Subsequent state assembly elections were held in late 2024, with a new government assuming office. Petitioners argue that further delay undermines constitutional values and the commitments made by the central government.
Next Steps
A detailed timeline has been set by the Court, requiring the Centre’s formal position in two months. The case will continue to draw attention due to its implications for Indian federalism and the rights of Jammu and Kashmir’s electorate.
