National PMO

PM Modi Addresses 2002 Gujarat Riots on Lex Fridman Podcast

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in a recent podcast interview, spoke about the 2002 Gujarat riots, stating that a “false narrative” was built around the events. He emphasized that judicial investigations have repeatedly proven his innocence, despite persistent political attacks from his opponents.

PM Modi on the 2002 Gujarat Riots

During the conversation, PM Modi reflected on Gujarat’s history of communal violence before 2002. He noted that riots had frequently occurred in the state, including in 1969, when disturbances lasted for months. He pointed out that Gujarat had witnessed over 250 significant riots before 2002, reinforcing his argument that communal violence was not unique to his tenure.

He expressed frustration over how the 2002 riots were selectively highlighted and politicized, stating that legal scrutiny and judicial investigations had cleared him of any wrongdoing. “Despite the tragedy, courts have examined everything in detail, and I have been proven innocent,” he asserted.

Judicial Scrutiny and Political Opposition

PM Modi reiterated that his administration faced intense scrutiny, with various attempts made to hold him accountable. However, after multiple legal investigations, including by the Supreme Court, no evidence was found linking him to any wrongdoing during the riots.

Despite this, opposition parties have continued to criticize his leadership during that period. Many have accused him of failing to prevent the violence and have often referenced former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s advice to follow “rajdharma” (duty of governance).

Political Reactions and Public Discourse

PM Modi’s remarks have reignited debates on the Gujarat riots, with opposition leaders accusing him of attempting to rewrite history. His political critics argue that he has consistently evaded responsibility, while his supporters maintain that he has been unfairly targeted for political reasons.

The podcast provided PM Modi with an opportunity to address the long-standing controversy, reaffirming his stance that the courts have vindicated him. His comments have further fueled discussions on political narratives, governance, and historical accountability in India.

+ posts

Related Posts