Madras HC Slams Police for Dismissing Ponmudy Complaints
The Madras High Court has strongly rebuked the Tamil Nadu police for closing over 120 complaints lodged against ex-minister K. Ponmudy, accusing them of acting “as if they are kings.” The court emphasized that allegations involving hate speech and derogatory comments deserve formal investigation and public notification, not unilateral dismissal.
Legal Oversight
Justice P. Velmurugan remarked that the police lack authority to determine the gravity of such complaints without conducting proper inquiries. He stressed that free speech under Article 19 does not exempt public figures from scrutiny, especially when their remarks target communities or religious identities.
Police Authority
The advocate general informed the court that the police had quietly closed the cases, judging that no offense had occurred. However, the court rejected this approach, stating that mere belief without process undermines the public’s right to remedy and sets a dangerous precedent for law enforcement.
Judicial Intervention
The court directed authorities to notify all complainants about the status of their cases. It warned of further legal action, including assignment of the cases to the CBI, if the police continue to delay or display inaction. A suo motu case will remain active until proper procedures are followed.
Political Speech
Ponmudy’s remarks—made during a public event—were widely perceived as mocking religious icons such as Shaivites and Vaishnavites, and included references to women. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh previously identified the statements as prima facie hate speech, prompting judicial scrutiny and widespread outrage.
